To Do Nothing or Have Nothing to Do, That is the Question
Is “doing nothing” a good use of your time?
When I was ten, I used to dream of a life that went like this—unencumbered wealth, a beautiful family, and all the free time in the world to spend lying down in a king-sized bed made of the world’s finest plumage.
Yet, as I’ve gotten older—and with that, experienced tens of spring, summer, autumn, and winter breaks—I’ve realized an epiphany. Laying idle in bed all day—perusing the infinite annals of Instagram reels and eating chocolate-covered blueberries from Kirkland—does not lead to a fulfilling life. Instead, I would see my mental and physical state degrade substantially during these periods, with weight gained, the want to be productive lost, and the remnants of my attention span mauled.
Indeed, it was those moments generally would be perceived as difficult—long work days, grueling school hours, afternoons and evenings filled with swim practices, piano lessons, and mathematics courses—in which, in retrospect, felt the most fulfilling.
Yes, firing on all cylinders repeatedly can be a difficult endeavor. Waking up at seven A.M. with the expectation to perform at school at a high level, then immediately going home to two hours of homework completion and piano practice—followed up by a grueling 90-minute swim practice, an hour of creative writing, and lights out—is no easy schedule for any high schooler. Yet, there always existed an intangible beauty in constantly having something to do. When any arbitrary period of time—be it a 24-hour-long span or months are end—is bounded by tasks that need to be accomplished or commitments that demand attention, life ebbs with unimpeded lubrication. When there is somewhere to be at eight A.M., at one P.M., at seven, at midnight, there is little room for personal stagnation.
On the other hand, the vast temporal expanse that a break offers can be the prime recipe for deterring personal progress. When there is nothing to do—no assignments scheduled, no practice to eagerly wait for or dread—it takes significant intrinsic motivation to fill the gaps up.
And we are human, with lulls in our judgment and lapses in our motivation. Sometimes, all we want to do is lie in bed all day and leave the television on. However, when schedules are jam-packed, there is no option to choose this life. When breaks are active with hour-long blocks to experiment with, on the other hand, comes the aforementioned lulls and lapses.
In life, truly having “nothing to do” can be viewed as a privilege. Having “nothing to do” inherently can mean no bills to pay, no practices to nervously anticipate, no Canvas assignments to be completed, no piano recital to prepare for and rehearse repeatedly. Yet, having “nothing to do” is not in the spirit of life. There are times when taking a pause and a breather can be extremely called for, but intentionally and continuously choosing “nothing” over “something” only incites stagnation. Indeed, we shouldn’t always do something. Yet, there should always be something to do.
I love how you debate of what "nothing to do" means. Most people would approach this as just doing nothing, but you raised a good point: doing nothing can mean you don't have to do homework, etc but it can also mean there is nothing that motivates you to do something. I also like the use of em dashes. It created a very casual tone while maintaining a sense of formality (not sure how to describe it). I would suggest making it somehow more personal to you. Sometimes it feels like I'm reading about a third person rather than you. Overall, great work Robert!
ReplyDeleteI think the foundation and structure of your essay is very sound. I do find a couple sections could be cut down, as you seem to use many examples, which can feel a bit repetitive. I also think that since you are making a specific argument, it could be valuable to dive into some counterpoints to further round out your point. Maybe mention the harms of always doing something. Couldn't it be argued that a strict schedule where you are always on auto-pilot, and you never just sit, can also be harmful and brain numbing? Besides that, great work!!
ReplyDeleteI like how you give the many examples, so even if the reader may not relate to the piano lessons, they can to one of the many other things we dread, and gain fulfillment from. In particular I related to the sports practices. When reading I feel like I should feel some sort of dread, but I don't due to some lacking descriptors in your essay. Possibly 'think aloud' about the worst possible case in swimming, piano and the other examples you gave. The first two paragraphs are great and lead a tone going into the rest of the essay. Overall great essay.
ReplyDeleteHi Robert, I loved how you formatted this essay around the two opposing sides of having "nothing to do." I agree with you on the fact that there is no right or wrong answer when it comes to this topic and I think it is important to find that balance in your own life. Something you can add to improve this essay is by integrating more personal experiences and examples rather than listing out activities. I think you can dive deeper in those activities. I like how this whole essay is more of a philosophical take on this debate and instead of reaching a conclusion, the ending is open to further interpretation. Really good start!
ReplyDelete